User talk:Дмитрий Кошелев

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Дмитрий Кошелев!


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Синельников_Валерий_Владимирович.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Синельников_Валерий_Владимирович.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

High Contrast (talk) 16:58, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Сегодня только увидел Вашу запись. Связался с владельцем изображения, его письмо перешлю по электронной почте.Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 10:58, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Дмитрий Кошелев!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:20, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File tagging File:Ingal5.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ingal5.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ingal5.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin H. (talk) 11:30, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. Copyright holder must give permission, we not assume that he gave permission somewhere to someone. --Martin H. (talk) 13:57, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because of the below I again noticed this - and that you removed the problem text but not resolved the problem.
Использование материалов с сайта «Путь в Сибирь» разрешено только в некоммерческих целях с обязательной ссылкой на первоисточник.
"Некоммерческие" is NOT accepted here. Images on Commons must be free to use by everyone for every purpose, everyone means every person or company on this planet, every purpose means educational purposs as well as commercial purposes. Do not upload non-free content here. --Martin H. (talk) 17:50, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Зря удалили. Автор изображения раза 3 связывался с администраторами, но его каждый раз просили что-то дополнить. Вот я и предложил ему ввести на сайте такую запись, иначе переписка с администраторами могла стать бесконечной. Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 18:00, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Also File:Ingal2.jpg from http://www.ikz.ru/siberianway/index.html - Использование материалов с сайта разрешено только в некоммерческих целях с обязательной ссылкой на первоисточник - only non-commercial! You selected the license {{Cc-by-3.0}}, the website not says one word about that license but something completely different. Please help to clean out the non-free images you uploaded here. Non-commercial or non-derivative is NOT accepted here. --Martin H. (talk) 17:57, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Использование материалов temples.ru[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content.

We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules.

In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files.

Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions.

Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.

العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  မြန်မာဘာသာ  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  русский  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  বাংলা   +/−

Дмитрий, в загруженном вами файле File:Tumen-img 1843b.jpg я обнаружил несоответствие лицензии и прав использования файла. Сайт temples.ru позволяет использовать свои материалы на условиях лицензии CC-BY-ND, а не СС-BY-SA-3.0 (это выделено у них в Правилах использования материалов красным цветом в пункте 3). Проверьте, пожалуйста, загруженные вами файлы на лицензионный статус. --Const st (talk) 17:17, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ну то есть by-nd на Викискладе запрещена? - Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 18:45, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Именно так(( --Const st (talk) 18:54, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Хочу спросить у Вас ещё совета как у человека опытного: что нужно изменить в описании File:Археологи_в_Ингальской_долине-2.jpg, чтобы соответствовать правилам Викисклада? А то понимание данных правил даётся мне тяжело. — Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 20:53, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
По нижеследующим файлам — Вам нужно связаться с администрациями сайтов и запросить у них разрешение на использование материалов в вики. Использование на викискладе подразумавает не просто размещение изображения, но и возможность его перерабатывать, исправлять и развивать, даже в коммерческих целях. --Const st (talk) 06:04, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
К сожалению, имел уже такой опыт (: Получилась переписка продолжительностью где-то в месяц: у правообладателя всё время запрашивали какую-то уточняющую информацию. В конце концов, терпение у того лопнуло и он вообще "забил". Было крайне неудобно, что только зря отнял у человека время. Больше рисковать не хочется. Может быть, имеются какие-то стандартные оговорки, которые можно размещать на сайтах-источниках и это будет свидетельствовать о соблюдении условий лицензии? - Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 06:20, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Честно говоря — не в курсе. --Const st (talk) 06:27, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Археологи_в_Ингальской_долине-2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Археологи_в_Ингальской_долине-2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin H. (talk) 18:01, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Давайте уточним. Есть общее разрешение на использование материалов сайта, содержащееся здесь - http://www.itogi.ru/archive/2006/32/38400.html. В файле это указано. Подскажите, что ещё необходимо конкретизировать. Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 18:16, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That is not a general permission for commercial reuse of the images. But thats what required here. You may reuse every image from the internet and it is always required to attribute the source, but you may not reuse any image from the internet for commercial purposes, thats copyright violation. --Martin H. (talk) 18:19, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Вроде бы говорится об использовании "в любой форме" и о "материалах" в целом, а не только о статьях. — Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 18:27, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Монумент_Победе_(Тобольск).JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Монумент_Победе_(Тобольск).JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ww2censor (talk) 21:11, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Насколько я понимаю, права на изображение принадлежат сайту, с которого оно взято. Соответствующая ссылка на разрешение в файле имеется: http://www.tobolsk.info/ - при использовании материалов ссылка обязательна. Каких-то других ограничений правообладатель не оговаривает. - Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 21:19, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Понятие использования никак не раскрывается. Согласно законодательства РФ ссылка обязательна даже при цитировании. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Предлагаю удалить - лишнее звено. Нет никакой нужды вставлять ещё один уровень между областью и городами (см. другие города в Category:Categories of Russia by city). NVO (talk) 22:19, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Предлагаю оставить. В России 1.098 городов. Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 05:45, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Только 8 из них имеют категорию Culture of... (впрочем, может и больше - просто не попали в сводную категорию). А далее следует разрыв дерева категории: по смыслу Category:Culture of Russia by city в неё должны входить именно города, но не "города такого-то региона". А в Category:Culture of Russia by region - Тюменская область одной строкой. Для "городов области" просто нет места (потому что нет нужды). NVO (talk) 06:04, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Какой-то совершенно бюрократический диалог. Ну сделайте категорию Category:Culture of Russia by region, чтобы было что обсуждать. - Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 06:13, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Дмитрий, я не делаю того, что считаю не нужным. Такой вот бюрократический подход. Не убедил - дело ваше. NVO (talk) 16:47, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Венелин Ю.И. - Влахо-болгарские или дако-славянские грамоты (1840).djvu. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Trex2001 (talk) 06:46, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Милый, расслабься, изображению уже 172 года. Авторское право давно истекло. - Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 06:49, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Археологи в Ингальской долине.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 11:59, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Тобольский кремль (Фликр).jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Тобольский кремль (Фликр).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Morning (talk) 13:49, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Исправлено. - Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 02:41, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category[edit]

Привет, являются "Gilevskaya Гроув" и "Gilevo роще" в том же месте ?, если Так в чем же разница между 2 Написание ? Благодаря (перевод с помощью Google Translator), –Davey2010Talk 15:58, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is the same place. "Gilevo" is a noun and a name of a village near the grove. "Gilevskaya" is an adjective has been made from "Gilevo". It is more suitable to say "Gilevo grove" or "Gilevskaya roscha". Not "Gilevo roscha" and "Gilevskaya grove". - Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 16:11, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oh my god I had no idea you spoke English , Ah okay thanks for explaining that, I'll move it now for you :), Thanks again, –Davey2010Talk 17:19, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request for pdf/mobi[edit]

I see you uploaded a djvu file of А.Ф. Вельтман - Счастье-несчастье; I would love to read this on my Kindle (I'm a huge Veltman fan), and I wonder if there's any way to get the novel in a .mobi or pdf file? Steve (languagehat @ gmail.com) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Languagehat (talk • contribs) 20:13, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I was surprised to meet Veltman's reader abroad, because the writer is almost unknown in Russia. You may download pdf here. - Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 04:07, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much! Believe me, he's even more unknown in the USA, but once I discovered him I wanted to read everything I could find by him. I've added my LH posts on him to my User page in case you're curious; I've also read Сердце и Думка and Светославич, вражий питомец (as well as some short stories), but for whatever reason didn't post about them. I have been unable to find Виргиния, Генерал Каломерос, Чудодей, or the first parts of MMMCDXLVIII год: Рукопись Мартына-Задека and Лунатик (why would Google only digitize the second parts??), but perhaps they will turn up eventually. At any rate, I am looking forward to reading Счастье-несчастье; thank you again! Languagehat (talk) 14:17, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Мастер-завтрак Панорама.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Мастер-завтрак Панорама.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

LX (talk, contribs) 22:45, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Удаляйте, если хочется. Авторша сейчас в Таджикистане, её так быстро не словить. — Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 04:07, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Dmitry Koshelev.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:17, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The source of file is my own site, it is under CC BY-SA 3.0. — Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 16:49, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This file contains Facebook metadata. May you explain why? Thanks, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:00, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Because I have an account in Facebook. This file is my avatar. — Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 17:06, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Dmitry Koshelev.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:53, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Kuharuk Ruslan.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:57, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Check dates, please. This file is made 2018-06-22. Your link is dated 2018-10-05. — Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 17:13, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Dom-gil-sherbina-tyumen-2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Sigwald (talk) 10:05, 5 June 2019 (UTC) P.S. На сайте (точнее в архивной его копии) никаких подтверждений заявленной лицензии я не вижу.[reply]

Ну что же, на том сайте и правда за 10 лет многое изменилось. Перефотографировал. — Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 15:03, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Дмитрий Кошелев,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Дмитрий Кошелев,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:43, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kajinsky Bernard.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:19, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Election in Nastroenie Tyumeni - 2018.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Election in Nastroenie Tyumeni - 2018.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

shizhao (talk) 02:28, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Election in Nastroenie Tyumeni - 2018.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mussklprozz (talk) 09:31, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. - Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 14:17, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:31, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Памятник пограничникам Отечества (Москва) 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Materialscientist (talk) 07:30, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request, as linked above. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion or Nominate category for discussion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests and COM:CFD#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy or the "By hand" portion of COM:CFD#Starting requests, normally collapsed), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:38, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I use delete option rarely, so I just forgot how do it correctly. — Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 16:14, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]